Throughout the history of the humanity it has been spoken of the Natural Right opposing its concept, I reach and influences to those of the positive right. Both represent the two faces of a same currency. They are the dialectic opposites with whom the notion has been understood exactly of the right whereas legal ordering. In order to understand better its meaning and boundaries we will see a little the beginning of the use of the straight positive term and the meaning that the positive right had for some authors, consequently will enter to define the basic characteristicses that form their global concept. Then, we will define the contours of the natural right, making a count brief than that notion it has meant throughout the history of the towns like Greek and the Roman, which was understood so like in medioevo and the present projection of its concept according to contemporary theses. Straight Positive Concepts and definitions the POSITIVE adjective seems to be used the first time by CALCIDIO – century IV when speaking of natural justice and positive justice. Later PIERRE ABELARD -1079 to 1142 – ius also used the expression positivum.
OF it defines it to the VECCHIO as the system of legal norms that indeed informs and regulates the life of a town at a certain historical moment. LEGAZ and LACAMBRA say that it is a social reality with the own characteristics of the social thing. These you complete definitions sin for being too ample to the point to allow to include in them the concept of Natural Right. GASTON defines it to JEZE as the set of solutions that in a certain country, certain moment, the Courts recognize like rules of social conduct. Him criticism saying itself that the concept of DP by country cannot be limited and that itself is recognized by the courts would be imputing him to them the quality of legislators.